„During the upcoming Ukrainian-Russian peace negotiations, it is likely that the international legal status existing at the beginning of the war will not receive publicity. The concealment of this has led to expert analyses explaining the war being publicized in an extremely distorted form, a process further aided by wartime media propaganda with its false reporting. It’s not a problem if more people become aware of the second most important trigger of the Russian-Ukrainian military conflict. (The first was the NATO threat, which the organization sought to escalate by admitting Ukraine as a member.)
Here is the information you couldn’t learn from the Atlantic media about the conflict:
The Charter of the United Nations (UN) emphasizes the principle of self-determination as a fundamental human right. This principle is articulated in two main ways in the Charter. Firstly, it recognizes a state’s right to freely choose its political, economic, social, and cultural system. Secondly, it acknowledges the right of a people—a group of individuals—to establish a state or freely determine their relationship with an existing state. These principles and rights are enshrined in Article 1(2) and Article 55(1) of the UN Charter.
In 2014, following the Nazi coup in Kyiv, the Nazis failed to gain the internal legitimacy required for statehood in the eastern regions of the former Ukrainian legal state. (It is a fundamental legal principle that without this, there is no state in the territory.) Consequently, the residents there, in accordance with Article 1(2) and Article 55(1) of the UN Charter, established their own sovereign republics. The Atlantic bloc—primarily the USA—protested against this, despite the fact that the regulation does NOT stipulate that such an act must be recognized or unrecognized by anyone—it remains valid regardless.
De facto and de jure, the Donbas republics are legitimate due to the referendums held, while the Kyiv government, forcibly installed after overpowering the territory left as no-man’s-land following the demise of the Ukrainian legal state and subjugating a portion of the compliant population, cannot be considered legitimate. Therefore, it had no rightful claim against the legitimate Donbas republics.
Turchynov and his ilk—the first figures forcibly brought to power in today’s Ukrainian ‘democracy’—first labeled these sovereign republics, which exist under international law, as ‘terrorists,’ then attacked them on April 14, 2014 (primarily targeting residential areas, schools, hospitals, markets, etc.). This marked the beginning of the ongoing war, during which the Ukrainians killed 15,000 Russian civilians in the first eight years.
The fighting continues today on the territory of these republics, over which the Kyiv Nazi coup government has never managed to gain ruling legitimacy. From this point, the liberal narrative that the Russians are the aggressors becomes laughable (this assertion violates the above-cited regulation, which protects a human right!).
The great Zelensky became the head of this Nazi state, founded by the Magyar-hating Nazi horde known as the Right Sector, and thus also the leader of the military force occupying the People’s Republics, committing mass murders and systematic, serial war crimes. Like the Nazis (and their Western patrons), he too denies the sovereign republics’ fundamental right to exist, guaranteed by international law. Like his predecessors, he calls the Ukrainians’ anti-Russian aggression in Donbas a ‘heroic Ukrainian defensive war,’ while labeling the republics’ genuine defensive war as imperialist aggression and terrorism.
In reality, the concealment and denial of these facts serve a dual purpose: firstly, to convince the masses that the Ukrainians are waging a ‘just’ war on their own land, rather than attacking one or more foreign countries. Secondly, to make the enormous bloodshed acceptable. Meanwhile, in reality, the Donbas republics are fighting a defensive war on their own territory against the aggressor Ukrainians, with the help of the Russian army as an allied CIS (Commonwealth of Independent States) force.
It’s also important to note that the Ukrainians and Americans specifically want to make peace with the Russians—and not with the attacked republics—because it would be a terribly humiliating and devastating defeat for them to have to negotiate peace with the sovereign republics they refuse to recognize, which they disparage as ‘separatist,’ ‘self-proclaimed,’ and ‘terrorist.’ (Being defeated by a nuclear power isn’t quite as dismissive.) The Ukrainians’ senseless military adventure in Kursk, the Ukrainian Nazis’ actions, and the Atlantic liberals’ communication regarding peace negotiations collectively serve this very purpose.
Don’t fall for it!!”
